What does Bill C-61 mean to Canadians?
Specifically, it includes measures that would:
expressly allow you to record TV shows for later viewing; copy legally purchased music onto other devices, such as MP3 players or cell phones; make back-up copies of legally purchased books, newspapers, videocassettes and photographs onto devices you own; and limit the "statutory damages" a court could award for all private use copyright infringements;
implement new rights and protections for copyright holders, tailored to the Internet, to encourage participation in the online economy, as well as stronger legal remedies to address Internet piracy;
clarify the roles and responsibilities of Internet Service Providers related to the copyright content flowing over their network facilities; and
provide photographers with the same rights as other creators.
What Bill C-61 does not do:
it would not empower border agents to seize your iPod or laptop at border crossings, contrary to recent public speculation
What this Bill is not:
it is not a mirror image of U.S. copyright laws. Our Bill is made-in-Canada with different exceptions for educators, consumers and others and brings us into line with more than 60 countries including Japan, France, Germany and Australia
Bill C-61 was introduced in the Commons on June 12, 2008 by Industry Minister Jim Prentice and Heritage Minister Josée Verner.
For more information, please visit the Copyright Reform Process website at
Copyright Reform Process - Home
Thank you for sharing your views on this important matter.
The Honourable Jim Prentice, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Industry
Looks like format shifting has been Ok-ed (copy CD audio to MP3 player, DVD to PSP, etc) - but reading the act it appears that you have to have an "obsolete technology" to do what this letter is stating has been ammended... Still I think there should be another tax applied to internet access that grants you the right to download non-commercial personal-use audio without penalty and eventually video. I prefer to pay $10 a month to use the internet 'freely' and know royalties are being made (likely in huge amounts) to the correct agencies/people responsible for the content. he does note we are 'in line' with this bill along with many other countries where I believe modchips ARE legal.