Quote:
Originally Posted by blklotus1
Took a quick skim of the actual document and came up with somthing very interesting..
(2) Paragraph 41.1(1)(b) does not apply to a
person who offers services to the public or
provides services for the purposes of circumventing
a technological measure if the person
does so for the purpose of making the computer
program and any other computer program
interoperable.
Now im no lawyer but if im reading this right, it will still be legal to use a modchip as long as said modchip is designed to make a computer program interoperable.
What im thinking is that as long as a modchip permits you to play other forms of media on your wii console that would not normally be playable on the wii (like making the wii load a computer game like doom) you can still legally sell, install and use a modchip.
Does this make any sense to anyone else?
|
That paragraph don't exist in the C-61 bill, least the first reading issued today. Its been modified now to you can't circumvent protection unless its to do with an investigation.
"(2) Paragraph 41.1(1)(b) does not apply if
the services are provided by or for the persons
responsible for carrying out such an investiga-
tion or such activities. "
Theres also this:
"(2) Paragraphs 41.1(1)(b) and (c) do not
apply to a person who offers services to the
public or provides services, or manufactures,
imports or provides a technology, device or
component, for the purposes of circumventing a
technological measure in accordance with sub-
section (1), to the extent that the services,
technology, device or component do not unduly
impair the technological measure. "
Modchips are defiantly outlawed in section 41 - but lawsuits in both England and Australia have ruled them legal... This should be a deciding factor for sure.